The Way Secret Filming Uncovered a £28 Million Timeshare Scheme

It has been described as one of the largest scams of its kind in the UK.

Altogether 14 defendants have been sentenced for their role in a £28 million scheme to defraud more than 3,500 timeshare investors.

The targets were eager to get out of long-standing timeshare contracts and tried to find support.

A large number were from 60 and 80. More than 500 of them lost in excess of £10,000, and a single victim transferred more than £80,000.

Those targeted were faced high-pressure sales meetings continuing for six hours. They were out of money, possessing worthless fake "credits" and still bound by expensive vacation property deals they often use.

The Company At the Heart of the Fraud

The business at the heart of the scam was the organization in question. They collected customers' funds to finance the directors' opulent lifestyle of prestigious schooling, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.

The man at the top of the organization, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven and a half year prison term in January for conspiracy to defraud.

Recently, his wife Nicola was among the last group to learn their fate.

She was handed a two-year suspended jail sentence at the judicial venue after confessing to financial crime.

The outcome represents a lengthy process and signifies a huge win for the victims who came forward, the police and the Crown.

The Way the Probe Was Initiated

The initial awareness of the company emerged during the mid-2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a media outlet, making documentary features.

A friend mentioned that his parent had inherited the use of a timeshare apartment in a European resort and, after decades of vacations, had begun looking to exit the contract.

It is important to recall how widespread timeshares had become with British holidaymakers in the eighties and nineties.

Timeshares enabled individuals to use the equivalent unit every year, or trade their vacation periods with fellow investors who had properties in alternative destinations. Roughly 600,000 holiday enthusiasts seized that option.

The initial boom was paired with a lot of reports about rip-off merchants mis-selling investments. They became a staple on investigative shows.

The typical timeshare contract tied investors in for long periods.

At that time, those holders who had experienced their guaranteed place in the resort for decades were advancing in years, and a significant number were looking to wave goodbye to their holiday properties.

Several had health issues and couldn't get to their properties. A few just thought they'd got all they wanted from them. And others had died, in numerous instances passing on their loved ones to take over the deals - including their annual payments and service charges.

The Investigation Progresses

It was at this point the family member had found herself. She looked online for answers and found SMT, a enterprise whose online presence promised to release her from her deal.

Yet, having paid a fee and scheduled a consultation with them, her family smelled a rat.

Further research showed many victims reporting they had submitted funds and received no benefit out of it. In fact, they had lost money. Significant sums.

The reporting group began investigating what was occurring. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters operating in the holiday ownership market.

An attorney had many grievance cases preparing to take action against the company.

We spoke to clients who had dealt with the organization and they collectively described identical situations. They believed the business would acquire their investment off them but when they attended a meeting (for which they made an advance payment) they were advised there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were persuaded - indeed coerced - to commit further cash investing in "the company's points system", named after the organization's holding firm, Monster Travel.

The precise definition was rather ambiguous. They appeared to be a form of credit, giving access to discount travel and benefits and shopping deals.

And they were seemingly "exchangeable with other owners, some time down the line.

Paying cash at the time would result in an eventual payoff that would pay for the company's charges and allow the investor in profit, released finally from their burdensome agreement.

An unbelievable offer? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Misleading Tactic'

Based on these descriptions were true, this was a large-scale fraud.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

An operator - here the company - "attracts the customer by advertising a defined offering but then to state it cannot be provided, pushing the customer to an alternative, lesser option.

Such practices are unlawful. Equipped with all the evidence we had assembled, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

The process requires commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to collect the information necessary to prove wrongdoing.

Armed with that permission, our compact group organized a consultation with one of the company's representatives in the location.

Pretending to be a ordinary individual aiming to help his mother released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement

Alexander Cole
Alexander Cole

Lena Visser is a landscape architect and sustainability advocate, sharing expert advice on urban gardening and eco-friendly living.